Net Deals Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Deepika Singh v. Central Administrative Tribunal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepika_Singh_v._Central...

    Atypical families are deserving of equal protection under law and benefits available under social welfare legislation. Decision by. D. Y. Chandrachud and A. S. Bopanna. Deepika Singh versus Central Administrative Tribunal & Ors. (2022) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that widens the definition of 'family' under Indian law.

  3. Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janhit_Abhiyan_v._Union_of...

    Court membership. Judges sitting. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit (CJI), Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, Justice Bela M Trivedi, Justice J B Pardiwala, and Justice Shripathi Ravindra Bhat. Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 55 OF 2019), also known as the EWS Reservation case, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India .

  4. ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADM_Jabalpur_v._Shivkant...

    ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla was a landmark judgement of the Supreme Court of India pertaining to the suspension of Articles 21 and 226 of the Indian Constitution in the event of a National Emergency. This controversial judgment of P.N. Bhagwati, decreed during the emergency from 25 June 1975 to 21 March 1977, held that a person's right to ...

  5. I.C. Golaknath and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anrs. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I.C._Golaknath_and_Ors._v...

    Justices K.N. Wanchoo, Vishistha Bhargava and G.K Mitter (writing together); R.S. Bachawat; V. Ramaswami. Golaknath v. State Of Punjab (1967 AIR 1643, 1967 SCR (2) 762), or simply the Golaknath case, was a 1967 Indian Supreme Court case, in which the Court ruled that Parliament could not curtail any of the Fundamental Rights in the Constitution.

  6. Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indra_Sawhney_&_Others_v...

    Union of India held that reservations cannot be applied in promotions. 1992 Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India judgment laid down the limits of the state's powers: it upheld the ceiling of 50 per cent quotas, emphasized the concept of "social backwardness", and prescribed 11 indicators to ascertain backwardness.

  7. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shreya_Singhal_v._Union_of...

    R.F. Nariman. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India [1] is a judgement by a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India in 2015, on the issue of online speech and intermediary liability in India. The Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, relating to restrictions on online speech, as unconstitutional on ...

  8. Indian Kanoon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Kanoon

    URL. indiankanoon .org. Launched. 2008; 16 years ago. ( 2008) Current status. Online. Indian Kanoon is an Indian law search engine. [ 1][ 2] It was launched on 4 January 2008. The search engine has been meshed with the highest courts and tribunals of India to provide up-to-date judgements. [ 3][ 4]

  9. K. M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K._M._Nanavati_v._State_of...

    The High Court dismissed the earlier acquittal by a Jury Trial and convicted the accused to life imprisonment under Sec. 302 of IPC. Commander K. M. Nanavati vs. State of Maharashtra was a 1959 Indian court case where Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati, a Naval Commander, was tried for the murder of Prem Ahuja, his wife's lover.