Net Deals Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Minerva Mills v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minerva_Mills_v._Union_of...

    Y. V. Chandrachud (Chief Justice) Concur/dissent. P. N. Bhagwati. Minerva Mills Ltd. and Ors. v. Union Of India and Ors. (case number: Writ Petition (Civil) 356 of 1977; case citation: AIR 1980 SC 1789) [ 1] is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India [ 2] that applied and evolved the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution of India.

  3. Collegium system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collegium_system

    The Indian Judicial Collegium system, where existing judges appoint judges to the nation's constitutional courts, has its genesis in, and continued basis resting on, three of its own judgments made by Supreme Court judges, which are collectively known as the Three Judges Cases. The collegium system has often been alleged to have caste bias due ...

  4. Olga Tellis and ors v. Bombay Municipal Corporation and ors

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olga_Tellis_and_ors_v...

    The right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the right to livelihood. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1986 AIR 180, 1985 SCR Supl. (2) 51) was a 1985 case in the Supreme Court of India. It came before the Court as a written petition by pavement and slum dwellers in Bombay (Now Mumbai), seeking to be ...

  5. Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janhit_Abhiyan_v._Union_of...

    Judges sitting. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit (CJI), Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, Justice Bela M Trivedi, Justice J B Pardiwala, and Justice Shripathi Ravindra Bhat. Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 55 OF 2019), also known as the EWS Reservation case, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India .

  6. ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADM_Jabalpur_v._Shivkant...

    ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla was a landmark judgement of the Supreme Court of India pertaining to the suspension of Articles 21 and 226 of the Indian Constitution in the event of a National Emergency. This controversial judgment of P.N. Bhagwati, decreed during the emergency from 25 June 1975 to 21 March 1977, held that a person's right to ...

  7. Deepika Singh v. Central Administrative Tribunal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepika_Singh_v._Central...

    Atypical families are deserving of equal protection under law and benefits available under social welfare legislation. Decision by. D. Y. Chandrachud and A. S. Bopanna. Deepika Singh versus Central Administrative Tribunal & Ors. (2022) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that widens the definition of 'family' under Indian law.

  8. State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Madras_v._Champak...

    Champakam Dorairajan ( AIR 1951 SC 226) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India. This judgement led to the First Amendment of the Constitution of India. It was the first major judgement regarding caste-based reservations in Republic of India. In its ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the Madras High Court judgement, which in turn had ...

  9. Court cases related to reservation in India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_Cases_Related_to...

    The Indian judiciary has made judgments related to reservations, a system of affirmative action that provides for disadvantaged groups. These groups are primarily Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SCs and STs), and from 1987 extended to Other Backward Classes (OBCs). Some of the court judgements have been modified by the Indian parliament .