Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Verifiability makes Wikipedia accurate and credible. Pages that lack credible sources tend to contain original research. The existence of nonverifiable pages encourages new Wikipedians to create the same (see Broken windows theory). It must be made clear that reliable sources are a requirement, not an option.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia, or as a source for copying or translating content. As a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, and any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or simply incorrect. Biographies of living persons, subjects ...
Fake news websites are those which intentionally, but not necessarily solely, publish hoaxes and disinformation for purposes other than news satire. Some of these sites use homograph spoofing attacks , typosquatting and other deceptive strategies similar to those used in phishing attacks to resemble genuine news outlets.
Criteria for evaluating reliability. The reliability of Wikipedia articles can be measured by the following criteria: Vandalism of a Wikipedia article. The section on the left is the normal, undamaged version; and on the right is the vandalized, damaged version. Accuracy of information provided within articles.
While they may resemble the format used by legitimate websites (especially in the case of the former), the content is by amateur writers paid by page views and other factors, and are effectively self-published, user-generated content that lacks editorial oversight. (see 1, 2, 3) Articlesnatch.com
The issue arises because nothing prevents someone from inserting “bogus” material, and the lack of control seems to doom Wikipedia as a credible source [11]. Essentially, “Wikipedia lacks scholarly backbone in the form of subject experts and a referee process” [12]. People can lie and have lied about their credentials.
Misinformation is incorrect or misleading information. [1] [2] Misinformation can exist without specific malicious intent; disinformation is distinct in that it is deliberately deceptive and propagated. [3] [4] [5] Misinformation can include inaccurate, incomplete, misleading, or false information as well as selective or half-truths. [6] [7]
For example, a web site that purports to list an artist's works is likely reliable for the fact that the artist authored a specific work, if the web site list meets other criteria for reliability (e.g., not under control of the artist or otherwise questionable), and especially if the list has some further indicia of reliability of existence and ...