Ads
related to: code review checklist
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Historically, the first code review process that was studied and described in detail was called "Inspection" by its inventor, Michael Fagan. [7] This Fagan inspection is a formal process that involves a careful and detailed execution with multiple participants and multiple phases.
Rational Team Concert Code Review: IBM actively developed Proprietary: Rational Team Concert Linux, macOS, Windows pre- and post-commit Review Board: reviewboard.org actively developed MIT: CVS, Subversion, Git (partial), Mercurial, Bazaar, Perforce, ClearCase, Plastic SCM Python: pre- and post-commit Rietveld: Guido van Rossum: actively ...
Fagan inspection. A Fagan inspection is a process of trying to find defects in documents (such as source code or formal specifications) during various phases of the software development process. It is named after Michael Fagan, who is credited with the invention of formal software inspections . Fagan inspection defines [citation needed] a ...
Software inspection. Inspection in software engineering, refers to peer review of any work product by trained individuals who look for defects using a well defined process. An inspection might also be referred to as a Fagan inspection after Michael Fagan, the creator of a very popular software inspection process.
Code review is systematic examination (often as peer review) of computer source code. Pair programming is a type of code review where two persons develop code together at the same workstation. Inspection is a very formal type of peer review where the reviewers are following a well-defined process to find defects.
Code audit. A software code audit is a comprehensive analysis of source code in a programming project with the intent of discovering bugs, security breaches or violations of programming conventions. It is an integral part of the defensive programming paradigm, which attempts to reduce errors before the software is released.
Automated code review. Automated code review software checks source code for compliance with a predefined set of rules or best practices. The use of analytical methods to inspect and review source code to detect bugs or security issues has been a standard development practice in both Open Source and commercial software domains. [1]
The purpose of a technical peer review is to remove defects as early as possible in the development process. By removing defects at their origin (e.g., requirements and design documents, test plans and procedures, software code, etc.), technical peer reviews prevent defects from propagating through multiple phases and work products and reduce the overall amount of rework necessary on projects.
Ads
related to: code review checklist