Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
An Ordinance to provide for prohibition of unlawful conversion from one religion to another by misrepresentation, force, undue influence, coercion, allurement or by any fraudulent means or by marriage and for the matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Citation. UP Ordinance No.21 of 2020. Territorial extent. Uttar Pradesh. Enacted by.
The Indian Judicial Collegium system, where existing judges appoint judges to the nation's constitutional courts, has its genesis in, and continued basis resting on, three of its own judgments made by Supreme Court judges, which are collectively known as the Three Judges Cases. The collegium system has often been alleged to have caste bias due ...
H2O Holy Faith - Maradu - Demolition H2O Holy Faith - Maradu - Demolition 2 Alfa Serene Tower 1 - Maradu - Demolition Alfa Serene Tower 2 - Maradu - Demolition. On 8 May 2019, the Supreme Court of India ordered five apartments in Maradu municipality in Kerala to be demolished within one month, for violation of Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) rules, although only four of these apartments had yet ...
Judges sitting. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit (CJI), Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, Justice Bela M Trivedi, Justice J B Pardiwala, and Justice Shripathi Ravindra Bhat. Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 55 OF 2019), also known as the EWS Reservation case, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India .
The right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the right to livelihood. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1986 AIR 180, 1985 SCR Supl. (2) 51) was a 1985 case in the Supreme Court of India. It came before the Court as a written petition by pavement and slum dwellers in Bombay (Now Mumbai), seeking to be ...
Indian Kanoon is an Indian law search engine. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] It was launched on 4 January 2008. The search engine has been meshed with the highest courts and tribunals of India to provide up-to-date judgements.
Outcome. Imprisonment and fine. Charges. Misuse of office, Disproportionate assets, Criminal conspiracy, Corruption. Verdict. Supreme Court: Trial court verdict restored. High Court: Acquitted of all charges, bail bonds discharged. Trial Court: 4 years' simple imprisonment for all four, a fine of ₹ 100 crore for Jayalalithaa and ₹ 10 crores ...
Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India is an Indian public interest litigation case challenging the 93rd Constitutional Amendment and the Central Educational Institutions (CEIs) (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 [ 1]. Reservations for underprivileged persons in public institutions is one of the policies devised by the Indian Legislature to ...