Net Deals Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Ordinance, 2020

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_of_Unlawful...

    An Ordinance to provide for prohibition of unlawful conversion from one religion to another by misrepresentation, force, undue influence, coercion, allurement or by any fraudulent means or by marriage and for the matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Citation. UP Ordinance No.21 of 2020. Territorial extent. Uttar Pradesh. Enacted by.

  3. Minerva Mills v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Minerva_Mills_v._Union_of_India

    Y. V. Chandrachud (Chief Justice) Concur/dissent. P. N. Bhagwati. Minerva Mills Ltd. and Ors. v. Union Of India and Ors. (case number: Writ Petition (Civil) 356 of 1977; case citation: AIR 1980 SC 1789) [ 1] is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India [ 2] that applied and evolved the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution of India.

  4. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navtej_Singh_Johar_v...

    Criminalization of Homosexuality, Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation. Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. v. Union of India thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice (2018) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that decriminalised all consensual sex among adults, including homosexual sex. [ 1]

  5. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevention_of_Money...

    Status: In force. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted by the NDA government to prevent money laundering and to provide for confiscation of property derived from money laundering. [ 1][ 2] PMLA and the Rules notified thereunder came into force with effect from 1 July 2005.

  6. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kesavananda_Bharati_v...

    A noted Indian jurist, Nanabhoy Palkhivala, convinced Swami into filing his petition under Article 26, concerning the right to manage religiously owned property without government interference. The case had been heard for 68 days, the arguments commencing on October 31, 1972, and ending on March 23, 1973, and its judgement consists of 700 pages.

  7. Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohd._Ahmed_Khan_v._Shah...

    Mohd. Ahmad Khan v. Shah Bano Begum [1985], [ 1] commonly referred to as the Shah Bano case, was a controversial maintenance lawsuit in India, in which the Supreme Court delivered a judgment favouring maintenance given to an aggrieved divorced Muslim woman. Then the Congress government enacted a law with its most controversial aspect being the ...

  8. State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Madras_v._Champak...

    Champakam Dorairajan ( AIR 1951 SC 226) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India. This judgement led to the First Amendment of the Constitution of India. It was the first major judgement regarding caste-based reservations in Republic of India. In its ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the Madras High Court judgement, which in turn had ...

  9. Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashoka_Kumar_Thakur_v...

    Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India is an Indian public interest litigation case challenging the 93rd Constitutional Amendment and the Central Educational Institutions (CEIs) (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 [ 1]. Reservations for underprivileged persons in public institutions is one of the policies devised by the Indian Legislature to ...