Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Prathiba Maninder Singh (born 20 July 1968) is a sitting judge of the Delhi High Court, in India. [1] She has made significant contributions to academic literature and legal developments in Indian intellectual property law, as a practicing lawyer, and as an advisor to several legislative committees concerned with drafting related legislation.
Naz Foundation by Supreme Court of India. Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2009)[ 1] is a landmark Indian case decided by a two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court, which held that treating consensual homosexual sex between adults as a crime is a violation of fundamental rights protected by India's Constitution.
Since. 9 November 2023. The High Court of Delhi ( Hindi: दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय; IAST: dillī uchcha nyāyālaya) was established on 31 October 1966, through the Delhi High Court Act, 1966.[ 2 ] It is the highest court performing judicial functions in the NCT of Delhi at the State level.
(Single-judge bench judgement dated 16 September 2016) The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford and Others v. Rameshwari Photocopy Services and Others (High Court of Delhi 2016-12-09), Text, archived from the original on 2019-05-30. (Division bench judgement dated 9 December 2016, on appeal)
Suresh Kumar Koushal & Anr. v. NAZ Foundation & Ors. (2013) is a case in which a 2 judge Supreme Court bench consisting of G. S. Singhvi and S. J. Mukhopadhaya overturned the Delhi High Court case Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and reinstated Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. The Supreme Court of India decided to revisit this ...
The e-Courts Integrated Mission Mode Project (Phase-I) is one of the national e-Governance projects being implemented in High Courts and district/subordinate Courts of the Country. [ 2] The Government approved the computerization of 14,249 district & subordinate Courts under the project by March 2014 with a total budget of Rs. 935 crore.
Arnesh Kumar Guidelines or Arnesh Kumar vs State of Bihar (2014) is a landmark judgement of the Indian Supreme Court, [ 1][ 2] stating arrests should be an exception, in cases where the punishment is less than seven years of imprisonment. [ 3] The guidelines asked the police to determine whether an arrest was necessary under the provisions of ...
Naz Foundation (2013): [19] Upheld and reinstated the Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code criminalising Anal sex. This judgement thus overruled Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2009): [20] Decriminalization of homosexual acts involving consenting adults throughout India. Deepika Singh v.