Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Ohio v. American Express Co., 585 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the nature of antitrust law in relationship to two-sided markets.The case specifically involves policies set by some credit card banks that prevented merchants from steering customers to use cards from other issuers with lower transaction fees, forcing merchants to pay higher transaction fees to ...
June 26, 2024 at 4:43 PM. A federal judge on Tuesday rejected a $30 billion antitrust settlement under which Visa and Mastercard agreed to limit fees they charge merchants that accept their credit ...
June 25, 2024 at 2:54 PM. Mark Lennihan/AP. A federal judge overseeing a $30 billion preliminary swipe-fees settlement between Mastercard, Visa and retailers formally rejected the deal Tuesday ...
June 25, 2024 at 12:35 PM. By Jonathan Stempel. NEW YORK (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Tuesday rejected a $30 billion antitrust settlement in which Visa and Mastercard agreed to limit fees they ...
Federal jury. A federal jury, in the United States, is impaneled to try federal civil cases and to indict and try those accused by United States Attorneys of federal crimes. A federal grand jury consists of 16 to 23 members and requires the concurrence of 12 in order to indict. [9] A federal petit jury consists of 12 members in criminal cases ...
An Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility is an application for legal entry to the United States made by an individual who is otherwise inadmissible on one or more grounds. The application is submitted to the consular office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services office or immigration court considering the immigrant visa or ...
Under the terms of the settlement rejected by the judge, card issuers would've lowered the typical 1.5% to 3.5% swipe fee by 0.04 percentage points for three years, capped fees for five years and ...
U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken on May 24, 2012, found Section 3 of DOMA and certain IRS regulations violated the plaintiffs' equal protection rights. Hara v. Office of Personnel Management, No. 09-3134 (Fed. Cir.) Hara is one of the plaintiffs in Gill. Torres-Barragan v. Holder, No. 10-55768 (9th Cir.) An immigration-related DOMA ...