Net Deals Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States free speech exceptions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech...

    United States free speech exceptions. The Bill of Rights in the National Archives. In the United States, some categories of speech are not protected by the First Amendment. According to the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Constitution protects free speech while allowing limitations on certain categories of speech. [1]

  3. Garcetti v. Ceballos - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garcetti_v._Ceballos

    Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving First Amendment free speech protections for government employees. The plaintiff in the case was a district attorney who claimed that he had been passed up for a promotion for criticizing the legitimacy of a warrant. The Court ruled, in a 5–4 decision, that ...

  4. Freedom of speech in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the...

    In the United States, freedom of speech and expression is strongly protected from government restrictions by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, many state constitutions, and state and federal laws. Freedom of speech, also called free speech, means the free and public expression of opinions without censorship, interference and ...

  5. First Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the...

    The First Amendment ( Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws respecting an establishment of religion; prohibiting the free exercise of religion; or abridging the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.

  6. 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/303_Creative_LLC_v._Elenis

    303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, 600 U.S. 570 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court decision that dealt with the intersection of anti-discrimination law in public accommodations with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In a 6–3 decision, the Court found for a website designer, ruling that the state ...

  7. Defending Free Speech Is a Dirty Job But Someone’s ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/entertainment/defending-free-speech...

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people ...

  8. Lloyd–La Follette Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lloyd–La_Follette_Act

    The government-wide prohibition on the use of appropriated funds to pay the salary of any federal official who prohibits or prevents or threatens to prohibit or prevent a federal employee from contacting Congress first appeared in the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1998, Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States) 105–61 ...

  9. Viewpoint: Indiana law could turn classrooms into free speech ...

    www.aol.com/viewpoint-indiana-law-could-turn...

    Instead of imposing state-monitored free speech, those concerned about academic freedom should be proposing solutions that promote the very intellectual diversity that SB 202 risks undermining ...