Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
During the riot, Samsel spoke with Joe Biggs and Ray Epps, knocked Capitol Police Officer Caroline Edwards unconscious, and instigated the breach of the Capitol. [ 124 ] In March 2024, Bloomberg reported that one of the January 6 participants, who was not named by Bloomberg, managed to avoid prosecution, and that this person was a federal employee.
Activision Blizzard is a current lawsuit filed by the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), now the Civil Rights Department (CRD) against video game developer Activision Blizzard in July 2021. The lawsuit asserts that management of Activision Blizzard allowed and at times encouraged sexual misconduct towards female ...
Capitol Police leadership had not planned for a riot or attack, [359] and on January 6, under "orders from leadership", the force deployed without riot gear, shields, batons, or "less lethal" arms such as sting grenades. Department riot shields had been improperly stored, causing them to shatter upon impact. [162]
August 5, 2024 at 3:08 PM. Jacob Chansley inside the Senate Chamber on January 06, 2021. - Win McNamee/Getty Images/File. US Capitol rioter Jacob Chansley, known as the “QAnon Shaman” for his ...
A St. Louis Cardinals superfan who used a police riot shield to lead a mob in overrunning a line of officers at a key Capitol entrance on Jan. 6 was sentenced Thursday to 10 months in prison ...
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".
The judge overseeing former President Donald Trump's federal election interference case has set a hearing for Aug. 16 at 10 a.m. Trump is not required to attend. This will be the first time in ...
Walter Roe Mansfield, John Joseph Smith, and Wilfred Feinberg. Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v Rockefeller, 477 F.2d 375 (1973) was a United States 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals case that affirmed the right of state prosecutors to choose whether to investigate and prosecute individuals that have potentially committed a crime. [1]