Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Ohio v. American Express Co., 585 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the nature of antitrust law in relationship to two-sided markets.The case specifically involves policies set by some credit card banks that prevented merchants from steering customers to use cards from other issuers with lower transaction fees, forcing merchants to pay higher transaction fees to ...
Swan (1953) Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/American Express Inc., 490 U.S. 477 (1989), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning the arbitration of securities fraud claims. It was originally brought by a group of Texas investors against their brokerage house.
In the United States, the federal government has sovereign immunity and may not be sued unless it has waived its immunity or consented to suit. [ 6] The United States as a sovereign is immune from suit unless it unequivocally consents to being sued. [ 7] The United States Supreme Court in Price v. United States observed: "It is an axiom of our ...
The Platinum Card from American Express is a popular rewards card known for its suite of luxury perks, such as concierge service, travel protections and access to various lounge networks. However ...
July 29, 2024 at 9:03 PM. By David Shepardson. WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court blocked on Monday the U.S. Transportation Department's new rule on upfront disclosure of airline fees ...
The prohibitively high cost of arbitration is not a sufficient reason for a court to overrule an arbitration clause that forbids class action suits. Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Am. Express Co. v. Italian Colors Rest., 570 U.S. 228 (2013), ( "Italian Colors") is a United States Supreme Court case decided ...
If you mainly fly with Delta Air Lines, the Delta SkyMiles® Gold American Express Card will probably be on your list of cards to check out. The card has a $150 annual fee that’s waived for the ...
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997) The Communications Decency Act, which regulates certain content on the Internet, is so overbroad that it is an unconstitutional restraint on the First Amendment. Kaelin v.