Net Deals Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. S Sushma v. Commissioner of Police - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S_Sushma_v._Commissioner...

    S Sushma & Anr. versus Commissioner of Police & Ors. (2021) is a landmark decision of the Madras High Court that prohibited practice of "conversion therapy" by medical professionals in India. [1] [2] [3] The court directed comprehensive measures to sensitize the society and various branches of the Union and State governments to remove ...

  3. G. R. Swaminathan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._R._Swaminathan

    Swaminathan was a part of the Hindu Munnani in 2015.. A lawyer representing Democratic Advocates' Association, wrote to the Madras High Court's Chief Justice in July 2022, requesting the resignation of Swaminathan, who had lauded BJP leader K. Annamalai in a court case, based on the premise that the court must be impartial and cannot endorse any political party.

  4. Arun Kumar v. Inspector General of Registration - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arun_Kumar_v._Inspector...

    Arun Kumar & Anr. versus Inspector General of Registration & Ors. (2019) is a decision of the Madras High Court which recognised trans woman as a "bride" within the meaning of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 and prohibited genital-normalizing surgery (referred to as sex reassignment surgery in the case) for intersex infants and children except on life-threatening situations.

  5. Madras High Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madras_High_Court

    The Madras High Court is the birthplace of organised legal reporting in India. It is home to the Madras Law Journal, [ 16 ] which was the first journal dedicated to reporting texts of judgments of the High Court. It started in 1891. The High Courts, c. 1905. The Saturday Club met every week.

  6. Sreeja S v. Commissioner of Police - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sreeja_S_v._Commissioner...

    The bench drew upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Soni Gerry v. Gerry Douglas (2018), wherein it was observed that the court cannot assume the role of parens patriae and curtail the liberty of an individual who has reached the age of majority. Similarly, the bench referred to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Nandakumar v

  7. State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Madras_v._Champak...

    Champakam Dorairajan ( AIR 1951 SC 226) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India. This judgement led to the First Amendment of the Constitution of India. It was the first major judgement regarding caste-based reservations in Republic of India. In its ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the Madras High Court judgement, which in turn had ...

  8. Custodial death of P Jayaraj and Bennicks - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Custodial_death_of_P...

    The Madurai bench of Madras High Court took suo motu cognizance of the matter and on 24 June, a bench consisting of Justices P.N. Prakash and B. Pugalendhi ordered the Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi, to inquire into the incident and submit a status report. [11]

  9. Srishti Madurai - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srishti_Madurai

    On 22 April 2019 the Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) passed a landmark judgment [9] and issued direction to ban sex-selective surgeries on intersex infants while referring work of Srishti Madurai. [10] The Court took note of the rampant practice of compulsory sex reassignment surgeries performed on intersex infants and children. [11] [12]