Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Dabblers (e.g., people who see some problem with an article and want to help) Scholars (e.g., researchers who want to use Wikipedia as an additional dissemination platform) Archivists (e.g., people who work or volunteer at a museum, archive, or library wanting to contribute artifacts, like 18th-century paintings)
Time ' s "The 25 Most Influential People on the Internet" (2017) Steven Pruitt (born April 17, 1984) is an American Wikipedia editor and administrator with the largest number of edits made to English Wikipedia, at over 5 million, having made at least one edit to one-third of all English Wikipedia articles. Pruitt first began editing Wikipedia ...
This essay describes the authors of Wikipedia(also called Wiki-authors) and how articles are developed. For the majority of articles, Wikipedia has become an immense "pot-luck dinner".[1] The articles are, mostly, a somewhat random collection of information that many people thought to be worthy of interest. One of the most difficult aspects for ...
Wikipedia is intended to be an objective resource, and it's very, very difficult for people to be fully objective about themselves or their company. If your life and achievements are verifiable and genuinely notable, then sooner or later someone else will probably create an article about you.
There are currently 47,799,234 Wikipedia accounts, of which 113,890 have made at least one edit during the last month. Wikipedia is in the palm of your hand—all you need to do is edit an article. Wikipedians are volunteers who contribute to Wikipedia by editing its pages, unlike readers who simply read the articles.
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and millions already have . Wikipedia's purpose is to benefit readers by presenting information on all branches of knowledge. Hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, it consists of freely editable content, whose articles also have numerous links to guide readers towards more information.
The idea expressed in Eventualism—that every Wikipedia article is a work in progress, and that it is therefore okay for an article to be temporarily unbalanced because it will eventually be brought into shape—does not apply to biographies. Given their potential impact on biography subjects' lives, biographies must be fair to their subjects ...
A feature of Wikipedia is the ability to tag an article or a section of an article as being the subject of a dispute about a neutral point of view. This feature is often used as a substitute for actually doing something constructive. To resolve the dispute, the interested editors will edit war until the article gets protected.