Net Deals Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kesavananda_Bharati_v...

    His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Anr. (Writ Petition (Civil) 135 of 1970), also known as the Kesavananda Bharati judgement, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Indian Constitution. [2] The case is also known as the Fundamental Rights Case.

  3. I.C. Golaknath and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anrs.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I.C._Golaknath_and_Ors._v...

    Justices K.N. Wanchoo, Vishistha Bhargava and G.K Mitter (writing together); R.S. Bachawat; V. Ramaswami. Golaknath v. State Of Punjab (1967 AIR 1643, 1967 SCR (2) 762), or simply the Golaknath case, was a 1967 Indian Supreme Court case, in which the Court ruled that Parliament could not curtail any of the Fundamental Rights in the Constitution.

  4. Minerva Mills v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minerva_Mills_v._Union_of...

    Y. V. Chandrachud (Chief Justice) Concur/dissent. P. N. Bhagwati. Minerva Mills Ltd. and Ors. v. Union Of India and Ors. (case number: Writ Petition (Civil) 356 of 1977; case citation: AIR 1980 SC 1789) [ 1] is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India [ 2] that applied and evolved the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution of India.

  5. Collegium system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collegium_system

    The Indian Judicial Collegium system, where existing judges appoint judges to the nation's constitutional courts, has its genesis in, and continued basis resting on, three of its own judgments made by Supreme Court judges, which are collectively known as the Three Judges Cases. The collegium system has often been alleged to have caste bias due ...

  6. Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janhit_Abhiyan_v._Union_of...

    Following the enactment of the One Hundred and Third Amendment Act of 2019, several writ petitions were filed, seeking to declare the amendment unconstitutional and in violation of the basic structure concept. By adding Articles 15(6) and 16(6) to the Indian Constitution, the state acquired the authority to impose specific restrictions on ...

  7. Seema Gavit and Renuka Shinde - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seema_Gavit_and_Renuka_Shinde

    Sisters Seema Mohan Gavit (born 1975) and Renuka Kiran Shinde (born 1973) are Indian serial killers convicted of kidnapping thirteen children and killing five of them between 1990 and 1996. [ 1][ 2] In association with their mother Anjanabai, they were active in various cities in western Maharashtra – Pune, Thane, Kalyan, Kolhapur, and Nashik ...

  8. Afzal Guru - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afzal_Guru

    Mohammad Afzal Guru (June 1969 – 9 February 2013) was a Kashmiri separatist [3] [4] who was convicted for his role in the 2001 Indian Parliament attack.He received a death sentence for his involvement, which was upheld by the Indian Supreme Court.

  9. Right to Privacy verdict - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_Privacy_verdict

    Legal experts have suggested that with this judgment, the judges have invalidated the reasoning behind the 2013 Judgement, thus laying the groundwork for Section 377 to be read down and the restoration of the 2009 High Court Judgement, thereby decriminalizing homosexual sex. [12] [13]